I often check in on NewGeography.com, a website led by southern California-based urban studies professor and famed suburbanist Joel Kotkin. If you’ve checked out the site, you may have noticed I’ve had some posts from this blog featured there. I don’t agree with everything on the site, which definitely has a sprawl-development lean, but I am interested in suburban maturation as much as urban revitalization. Hey, I live in one of the suburbiest of suburbs, Naperville, IL.
Some recent headlines there really struck me as efforts to demonstrate the enduring and everlasting appeal of suburbs over cities. Check these out:
- Gen Z Moving Out Of Cities
- Kill Off The Old City So New Cities Can Be Born
- Urban Sprawl, The Environmentally Friendly Answer To Expensive Housing
- Remote And Hybrid Work Continues Appeal In The U.S. And Canada
- To Reduce Costs, California Also Needs To Build New Suburbs
And those are just from the last ten days.
My takeaway from pieces like these? Cities were the past, suburbs are the present and future. Young people prefer them. The rise of the work-from-home phenomenon has boosted them. They are the answer to our housing affordability crisis. They are the solution for all that ails America.
Suburbs have won. Get over it. Resistance is futile.
Urbanists try to counter this by demonstrating the efficiency of city living, especially when served by effective public transit. Cities are places where people connect, where ideas are born, and today’s modern economy, based on knowledge and creativity, is firmly rooted. Cities have become the nation's economic engine. But none of that matters to suburbanists.
Why?
I had the most amazing revelation the other day. When it comes to the kind of places people choose to live, the places people prefer, and the places that are growing in absolute if not relative terms, cities will always lose out to suburbs. The way we define cities and suburbs in America – cities are fixed constants while suburbs are ever-expanding variables – simply isn't comparable. Unless our definitions change somehow, it will always be that way.
Read the rest of this piece at Corner Side Yard Blog
Pete Saunders is a writer and researcher whose work focuses on urbanism and public policy. Pete has been the editor/publisher of the Corner Side Yard, an urbanist blog, since 2012. Pete is also an urban affairs contributor to Forbes Magazine's online platform. Pete's writings have been published widely in traditional and internet media outlets, including the feature article in the December 2018 issue of Planning Magazine. Pete has more than twenty years' experience in planning, economic development, and community development, with stops in the public, private and non-profit sectors. He lives in Chicago.
Photo: courtesy Corner Side Yard Blog.